There’s an provocative essay on this UCSD-affiliated blog about the rather extreme and violent examples used frequently in ethics classes, and whether they might be doing more harm than good. The discussion following the essay is very good and interesting.
Do you have a class “Ethics for business majors”. I get the feeling that ‘business’ and ‘Ethics” are metaphors for oil and water.
How about a vicious ethics situation for CEOs:
You and 50 people are out in a boat and you have been elected to steer the boat while the others row. You see two places to point the boat. One will bring everyone in the boat to safe harbor where all can enjoy their lives in simple living. The other will bring you to a blissful land of great riches but all rowers will die to get you there. What do you do?
So the example of the 50 people and the boat was actually mine, and I found your comment here after myself commenting on the post that’s linked to above, in which the author disparages the use of examples such as mine in moral philosophy.
It’s interesting that you ask about business ethics, since I’m currently teaching for a class in business ethics, and attempting to introduce my students to the world of philosophical ethics. In my experience there’s not all that much difference in the character of the discussions of practical ethical issues between classes of business students and classes of philosophy students. Once I get the business students accustomed to thinking about issues from an ethical perspective (rather than a purely economic perspective), they’re able to engage in ethical reasoning just like my philosophy students.
Of course this doesn’t mean that they won’t go out and make purely selfish decisions once they’ve landed their six figure jobs after graduation. In fact, many of them probably will. But then, again, so will a lot of the philosophy students.
Your blogspot is filled with excellent topics for me to browse.
I agree that business students and eventual CEOs are no more susceptible to unethical behavior than scientists (I’m a scientist). It is just that CEO misbehavior affects so many people (workers, investors, etc). I get more than a little perturbed that we embrace capitalistic freedom to the extent that unethical behavior of the few — pays so well and harms so many. SEC governance is never as vigorous as I would like to see.
* Interested in presenting a paper at an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE or publishing in an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL? You should consider it! To see what options are available, both in state and out of state, click here.
* BOWLING FOR PHILOSOPHICAL TRUTH: Monday, February 20th, 7 pm, Logan Lanes
PHILOSOPHY BOWLING RESULTS
• Is the world eternal? YES
• Do humans have contra-causal free will (i.e., can humans do otherwise)? NO
• Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? YES
• Do humans have souls? YES
• Are there natural rights? YES
• Is it morally permissible to eat meat? NO
• Is the unexamined life worth living? NO
• Is truth subjectivity? YES
“Creation and evolution” blog
Check out this blog by USU philosophy students, updated as they work through some challenging texts - pro and con - on whether Darwinism has what it takes to explain nature.
Do you have a class “Ethics for business majors”. I get the feeling that ‘business’ and ‘Ethics” are metaphors for oil and water.
How about a vicious ethics situation for CEOs:
You and 50 people are out in a boat and you have been elected to steer the boat while the others row. You see two places to point the boat. One will bring everyone in the boat to safe harbor where all can enjoy their lives in simple living. The other will bring you to a blissful land of great riches but all rowers will die to get you there. What do you do?
Hey Vince,
So the example of the 50 people and the boat was actually mine, and I found your comment here after myself commenting on the post that’s linked to above, in which the author disparages the use of examples such as mine in moral philosophy.
It’s interesting that you ask about business ethics, since I’m currently teaching for a class in business ethics, and attempting to introduce my students to the world of philosophical ethics. In my experience there’s not all that much difference in the character of the discussions of practical ethical issues between classes of business students and classes of philosophy students. Once I get the business students accustomed to thinking about issues from an ethical perspective (rather than a purely economic perspective), they’re able to engage in ethical reasoning just like my philosophy students.
Of course this doesn’t mean that they won’t go out and make purely selfish decisions once they’ve landed their six figure jobs after graduation. In fact, many of them probably will. But then, again, so will a lot of the philosophy students.
Brian,
Your blogspot is filled with excellent topics for me to browse.
I agree that business students and eventual CEOs are no more susceptible to unethical behavior than scientists (I’m a scientist). It is just that CEO misbehavior affects so many people (workers, investors, etc). I get more than a little perturbed that we embrace capitalistic freedom to the extent that unethical behavior of the few — pays so well and harms so many. SEC governance is never as vigorous as I would like to see.