<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of [contemporary] Intelligent Design?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://usuphilosophy.com/2010/02/11/the-end-of-contemporary-intelligent-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://usuphilosophy.com/2010/02/11/the-end-of-contemporary-intelligent-design/</link>
	<description>Happenings in and around the USU Philosophy program</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 21:05:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Krumpos</title>
		<link>http://usuphilosophy.com/2010/02/11/the-end-of-contemporary-intelligent-design/#comment-4543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Krumpos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usuphilosophy.com/?p=1315#comment-4543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physicists are searching for the &quot;creator&quot;; they call it the Higgs boson. Evolution came later. To say evolution is not intelligent or lacks design is to deny recent discoveries of microbiology and astrophysics. Before you reject ID entirely, read the 40 books on psychology, biology and physics in the bibliographies of my e-book at http://www.suprarational.org  If we were to completely dismiss that which we didn&#039;t understand, progress in science and technology would come to a halt. It is the mysteries of life that drive researchers onward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physicists are searching for the &#8220;creator&#8221;; they call it the Higgs boson. Evolution came later. To say evolution is not intelligent or lacks design is to deny recent discoveries of microbiology and astrophysics. Before you reject ID entirely, read the 40 books on psychology, biology and physics in the bibliographies of my e-book at <a href="http://www.suprarational.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.suprarational.org</a>  If we were to completely dismiss that which we didn&#8217;t understand, progress in science and technology would come to a halt. It is the mysteries of life that drive researchers onward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Krumpos</title>
		<link>http://usuphilosophy.com/2010/02/11/the-end-of-contemporary-intelligent-design/#comment-4522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Krumpos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usuphilosophy.com/?p=1315#comment-4522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are four excellent books related to this topic, written by 20th and 21st Century scientists who are also deeply religious. Intelligent design need not mean creationism; evolution need not mean lack of intelligence.

&quot;The Language of God,&quot; by Francis S. Collins (Free Press/Simon &amp; Schuster 2006). Dr Collins was head-Human Genome Project. He believes that faith in God and science can co-exist and be harmonious.

&quot;Let There be Light,&quot; by Howard Smith (New World Library 2006). Dr. Smith is a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center. He explains how modern study of the cosmos complements the Kabbalah.

&quot;Intelligence in Nature,&quot; by Jeremy Narby (Jeremy P. Thatcher/Penguin 2005). Dr. Narby has a doctorate in  anthropology. He makes a reasoned connection between shamanistic beliefs and modern science.

“Quantum Questions / Mystical Writings of the World’s Greatest Physicists” (Shambala Publications 2001), edited by Ken Wilber. This book includes lengthy essays by Heisenberg, Schroedinger, de Broglie, Jeans, Planck, Pauli, and Eddington. 

These books, among others on psychology, psychiatry, biology, neurology, physics, and astronomy, were helpful in preparing my e-book at http://www.suprarational.org and balanced the input of the five major religions and their mystics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are four excellent books related to this topic, written by 20th and 21st Century scientists who are also deeply religious. Intelligent design need not mean creationism; evolution need not mean lack of intelligence.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Language of God,&#8221; by Francis S. Collins (Free Press/Simon &amp; Schuster 2006). Dr Collins was head-Human Genome Project. He believes that faith in God and science can co-exist and be harmonious.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let There be Light,&#8221; by Howard Smith (New World Library 2006). Dr. Smith is a senior astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center. He explains how modern study of the cosmos complements the Kabbalah.</p>
<p>&#8220;Intelligence in Nature,&#8221; by Jeremy Narby (Jeremy P. Thatcher/Penguin 2005). Dr. Narby has a doctorate in  anthropology. He makes a reasoned connection between shamanistic beliefs and modern science.</p>
<p>“Quantum Questions / Mystical Writings of the World’s Greatest Physicists” (Shambala Publications 2001), edited by Ken Wilber. This book includes lengthy essays by Heisenberg, Schroedinger, de Broglie, Jeans, Planck, Pauli, and Eddington. </p>
<p>These books, among others on psychology, psychiatry, biology, neurology, physics, and astronomy, were helpful in preparing my e-book at <a href="http://www.suprarational.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.suprarational.org</a> and balanced the input of the five major religions and their mystics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://usuphilosophy.com/2010/02/11/the-end-of-contemporary-intelligent-design/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usuphilosophy.com/?p=1315#comment-4345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://creationmuseum.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;intelligent design&lt;/a&gt; isn&#039;t going anywhere for a long time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, <a href="http://creationmuseum.org/" rel="nofollow">intelligent design</a> isn&#8217;t going anywhere for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: source</title>
		<link>http://usuphilosophy.com/2010/02/11/the-end-of-contemporary-intelligent-design/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[source]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://usuphilosophy.com/?p=1315#comment-4317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

