This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 17th, 2012 at 10:45 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
4 Responses to Plato and Kierkegaard vindicated (per the Oracle of Logan Lanes)!
Not much to report – I don’t remember the scores, though the ones for Plato were quite decisive, and the ones for Kierkegaard less so. Holberg has astonishing skill.
* Interested in presenting a paper at an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE or publishing in an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL? You should consider it! To see what options are available, both in state and out of state, click here.
* BOWLING FOR PHILOSOPHICAL TRUTH: On vacation until September!
PHILOSOPHY BOWLING RESULTS
• Is the world eternal? YES
• Do humans have contra-causal free will (i.e., can humans do otherwise)? NO
• Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? YES
• Do humans have souls? YES
• Are there natural rights? YES
• Is it morally permissible to eat meat? NO
• Is the unexamined life worth living? NO
• Is truth subjectivity? YES
• Is virtue necessary for happiness? YES
• Can a computer have a mind? YES
• Can humans know reality as it is in itself? YES
• Is hell other people? YES
Any highlights or a lengthier summary for those of us who were unable to attend?
Not much to report – I don’t remember the scores, though the ones for Plato were quite decisive, and the ones for Kierkegaard less so. Holberg has astonishing skill.
As you have noticed in the past Dr. Hunemann, it is strange how the oracle tends to favor the better bowlers.
If it favors plato it favors better philosophers