without by any means suggesting that he would (or should) have wound up as a contender in the final poll, I think Freud should have appeared as a candidate on at least one of the earlier, more restricted polls.
There’s a juicy piece in the May 15 TLS, pp. 14-15 (which I can’t find online) by Lesley Chamberlain (author of “Nietzsche in Turn”, which I’ve yet to read but heard good things about) on Heidegger: Dear little soul: Heidegger’s marriage and womanizing reflect the coldness and impersonality at the centre of his philosophy[!].
It opens with:
“Is it the shadow of the loveless Nietzsche that makes one so surprised to find Heidegger a womanizer?”
USUPhilosophy 
I’m not going to lie i’m disappointed Heidegger diddnt even make the list!
LikeLike
Yes, that says something about the blog’s readership.
LikeLike
without by any means suggesting that he would (or should) have wound up as a contender in the final poll, I think Freud should have appeared as a candidate on at least one of the earlier, more restricted polls.
LikeLike
There’s a juicy piece in the May 15 TLS, pp. 14-15 (which I can’t find online) by Lesley Chamberlain (author of “Nietzsche in Turn”, which I’ve yet to read but heard good things about) on Heidegger: Dear little soul: Heidegger’s marriage and womanizing reflect the coldness and impersonality at the centre of his philosophy[!].
It opens with:
“Is it the shadow of the loveless Nietzsche that makes one so surprised to find Heidegger a womanizer?”
LikeLike
?
LikeLike
I think all were great , But I also think Russell by far contributed mors to change the world than any other
LikeLike