Philosophy@Utah State

Home » Actual philosophical discussion! » The ethics of vicious examples in ethics

The ethics of vicious examples in ethics

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 106 other followers

Old Main, USU


You need a Philosophy T-shirt! For more information, please click here.


* Interested in presenting a paper at an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE or publishing in an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL? You should consider it! To see what options are available, both in state and out of state, click here.


• Is the world eternal? YES
• Do humans have contra-causal free will (i.e., can humans do otherwise)? NO
• Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? YES
• Do humans have souls? YES
• Are there natural rights? YES
• Is it morally permissible to eat meat? NO
• Is the unexamined life worth living? NO
• Is truth subjectivity? YES
• Is virtue necessary for happiness? YES
• Can a computer have a mind? YES
• Can humans know reality as it is in itself? YES
• Is hell other people? YES
• Can art be created accidentally? NO
• Can we change the past? NO
• Are numbers real? NO
• Is it always better to know the truth? YES

Blog Stats

  • 195,738 hits

There’s an provocative essay on this UCSD-affiliated blog about the rather extreme and violent examples used frequently in ethics classes, and whether they might be doing more harm than good. The discussion following the essay is very good and interesting.


1 Comment

  1. Brian Berkey says:

    Hey Vince,

    So the example of the 50 people and the boat was actually mine, and I found your comment here after myself commenting on the post that’s linked to above, in which the author disparages the use of examples such as mine in moral philosophy.

    It’s interesting that you ask about business ethics, since I’m currently teaching for a class in business ethics, and attempting to introduce my students to the world of philosophical ethics. In my experience there’s not all that much difference in the character of the discussions of practical ethical issues between classes of business students and classes of philosophy students. Once I get the business students accustomed to thinking about issues from an ethical perspective (rather than a purely economic perspective), they’re able to engage in ethical reasoning just like my philosophy students.

    Of course this doesn’t mean that they won’t go out and make purely selfish decisions once they’ve landed their six figure jobs after graduation. In fact, many of them probably will. But then, again, so will a lot of the philosophy students.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: