Though it was late in getting posted, PHIL 4250 Tolkien and Lewis on Myth and Truth will be offered Fall 2020. Please spread the word to fans of Tolkien and Lewis!

# Ethics Slam! Wednesday 6 pm, Lucky Slice

Come discuss free speech and the internet!

# Good luck, USU Ethics Bowl team!

They are traveling to Atlanta to compete in the 2020 Ethics Bowl Nationals! Good luck! May your moral acumen humble your opponents into smaller bumps on the wide landscape of moral reasoning!

# Discussion with Utah Court of Appeals

Event on February 28th!

# Does social justice impair intellectual diversity?

An upcoming debate on campus between a Christian and an atheist –

# Undergrad philosophy conference, SUU

You should consider this!

# Undergraduate Teaching Fellows

We have some limited spots available for Undergraduate Teaching Fellows. If you have taken Intro, Ethics, or Social Ethics, and are interested in serving, please send me a note (charlie.huenemann@usu.edu). The basic idea is that you assist an instructor and serve as a tutor, and get paid $750 for the semester.

# Explaining Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem in words of one syllable or less

As the semester wraps up, and students are busily trying to write clearly about difficult stuff, they may be encouraged by this effort of George Boolos to explain Gödel’s second Incompleteness theorem in words of one syllable:

**Gödel’s Second Incompleteness Theorem**

**Explained in Words of One Syllable**

First of all, when I say “proved”, what I will mean is “proved with the aid of

the whole of math”. Now then: two plus two is four, as you well know. And,

of course, it can be proved that two plus two is four (proved, that is, with the

aid of the whole of math, as I said, though in the case of two plus two, of

course we do not need the whole of math to prove that it is four). And, as

may not be quite so clear, it can be proved that it can be proved that two plus

two is four, as well. And it can be proved that it can be proved that it can be

proved that two plus two is four. And so on. In fact, if a claim can be proved,

then it can be proved that the claim can be proved. And that too can be

proved.

Now, two plus two is not five. And it can be proved that two plus two is not

five. And it can be proved that it can be proved that two plus two is not five,

and so on.

Thus: it can be proved that two plus two is not five. Can it be proved as well

that two plus two is five? It would be a real blow to math, to say the least, if

it could. If it could be proved that two plus two is five, then it could be

proved that five is not five, and then there would be no claim that could not

be proved, and math would be a lot of bunk.

So, we now want to ask, can it be proved that it can’t be proved that two plus

two is five? Here’s the shock: no, it can’t. Or, to hedge a bit: if it can be

proved that it can’t be proved that two plus two is five, then it can be proved

as well that two plus two is five, and math is a lot of bunk. In fact, if math is

not a lot of bunk, then no claim of the form “claim X can’t be proved” can be

proved.

So, if math is not a lot of bunk, then, though it can’t be proved that two plus

two is five, it can’t be proved that it can’t be proved that two plus two is five.

By the way, in case you’d like to know: yes, it can be proved that if it can be

proved that it can’t be proved that two plus two is five, then it can be proved

that two plus two is five.

# Philosophy of Math lecture

Lecture today!