The “should be” greats

There have been some very interesting lists of “great 8” philosophers offered in response to Kleiner’s post — check them out! It leads me to raise a related question: what is your list of philosophers whom you think really are valuable and important but who are either unknown, or are wrongly neglected, or at any rate should be more widely read?

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “The “should be” greats

  1. Huenemann Post author

    My own list, to get the ball rolling:

    1. Leslak Kolakowski — a massively learned historian of philosophy, known mainly for his devastating critique of Marxism, but I like him for his essays which are profound, skeptical, and gnomic.

    2. Lou Salome — Nietzsche’s friend and Freud’s pupil, really astute

    3. Walt Whitman — widely read, of course, but I don’t think philosophers study him as much as they should.

    4. Terry Gilliam — not to be read, but seen; his film works are as philosophical as anyone’s; why is he ignored?

    Like

    Reply
  2. Mike

    Simone de Beauvoir — I would much rather read her than Sartre. Wikipedia says “The ambiguity about which Beauvoir writes clears up some inconsistencies that many, Sartre included, have found in major existentialist works such as Being and Nothingness.” Her writing is much more understandable which leads me to believe she’s the greater thinker.

    Montaigne — especially his influence on Nietzsche but also as a grandfather of animal rights (as opposed to Descartes). Correct me if I’m wrong but I think he also had an influence on Kierkegaard. He also demonstrates one of my favorite forms of life, the heretic. A cursory look at the wikipedia entry shows that there are quite a few more who Montaigne influenced including Shakespeare, Pascal and Emerson.

    Wilmington Michel de Montaigne occupies a unique place in Nietzsche’s history of ideas. He is one of a very few figures for whom Nietzsche expresses deep admiration and about whom he has virtually nothing critical to say. This is a rare enough mark of distinction; but contrary to what it might lead us to expect, the relationship between Montaigne and Nietzsche has seldom been carefully examined. There has yet to be a book-length study devoted solely to Montaigne and Nietzsche, and article-length treatments of the relationship between their works and thought have been surprisingly scarce. What discussions there have been tend to locate the connections between Nietzsche and Montaigne mainly in matters of either literary or personal style, but studies that examine Montaigne’s influence on Nietzsche with an eye toward philosophical rather than literary or stylistic issues have been almost non-existent.

    “We do not place ourselves above other animals and reject their condition and companionship by right reason but out of stubbornness and insane arrogance.” –from google-ing

    Dostoevsky – To the extent Philosophy is really about embodied attitude, he’s the master. He demonstrates the extent to which he understands and he understands as only a madman can.

    Sorry I don’t have anything more obscure to add. I’ve heard Native American tradition and practice resembles eastern thought in some profound ways but I have yet to investigate.

    “Wikipedia says” is the new “Confucius say”.

    Like

    Reply
  3. Joe

    1. Moses Maimonides – much of Aquinas’s work was influenced by Maimonides “via negativa.”

    2. Bernard Bolzano – the analytic philosophy movement began with him, not Frege and Russell. In fact, much of what Frege and Russell have argued appears in Bolzano’s works.

    3. Jean Buridan – His work in logic was very influential in early modern Europe, but he has been overshadowed by Ockham.

    4. Rogers Albritton and Burton Dreben – two relatively unknown figures who taught at Harvard for a very long time with Quine, Putnam, and Rawls. They were very influential upon them, but they will remain unknown because they never really published anything super substantive.

    Like

    Reply
  4. Huenemann Post author

    Joe — good list! Re. Bolzano, there is a very good book called “The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap” by Alberto Coffa, which examines many interesting and neglected 19th-c. figures, including Bolzano. Re. Dreben, I met him a couple of times, and he really had a mesmerizing personality, and influenced a generation of philosophers who are “in charge” now. Complicated and interesting guy, I am led to believe (two of my own teachers were his students). You can gather some of his influence here:

    http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2004/12/drebenized.html

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s