Philosophy@Utah State

Home » Uncategorized » Whence belief in free will?

Whence belief in free will?

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 98 other followers

Old Main, USU

T-shirts


You need a Philosophy T-shirt! For more information, please click here.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

* Interested in presenting a paper at an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE or publishing in an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL? You should consider it! To see what options are available, both in state and out of state, click here.

PHILOSOPHY BOWLING RESULTS

• Is the world eternal? YES
• Do humans have contra-causal free will (i.e., can humans do otherwise)? NO
• Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? YES
• Do humans have souls? YES
• Are there natural rights? YES
• Is it morally permissible to eat meat? NO
• Is the unexamined life worth living? NO
• Is truth subjectivity? YES
• Is virtue necessary for happiness? YES
• Can a computer have a mind? YES
• Can humans know reality as it is in itself? YES
• Is hell other people? YES
• Can art be created accidentally? NO
• Can we change the past? NO
• Are numbers real? NO
• Is it always better to know the truth? YES

Blog Stats

  • 192,596 hits

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. blood_and_ashes says:

    Sounds like a common liberal atheist reaction, hehe. I still wonder if this leads to the conclusion that humans are only reactionary devices like calculators, which would make the final stage totally empty. Yet too many I know who are willing to go that far are morally unwilling to accept it being empty.

    Like

  2. Dan says:

    Was the nihilist’s suicide intentionally posted alongside this diagram, to show the (il)logical end of such thinking?

    Like

  3. Michael Thomas says:

    Even a deterministic universe of finite size larger than N appears to be infinite from where we stand. That assumption about the universe means that understanding that universe with brain size X < N allows for N-X gaps in understanding with imperfect abstract models of the gaps. Even if society increases X through the division of knowledge by factor a; as long as we believe that aX < N then we have the same problem (N-aX gap) so a is meaningfully irrelevant (society faces the same problem as the individual). Error or noise in the system is introduced which makes the determined universe interesting. It seems that timing the correction of error leaves a vanishingly small opportunity for action irreducible to determined reaction, a space for humanity and creativity. Not all balancing tensions in the physical universe are human phenomena meaning that correlated deviation from the mean (in terms of human existence) could exist for non-zero finite periods. All I need now is some theory of friction that extends these creative moments beyond the near-zero epsilon parameter.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: