Philosophy@Utah State

Home » Uncategorized » The decline effect

The decline effect

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 97 other followers

Old Main, USU

T-shirts


You need a Philosophy T-shirt! For more information, please click here.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

* Interested in presenting a paper at an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE or publishing in an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL? You should consider it! To see what options are available, both in state and out of state, click here.

PHILOSOPHY BOWLING RESULTS

• Is the world eternal? YES
• Do humans have contra-causal free will (i.e., can humans do otherwise)? NO
• Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? YES
• Do humans have souls? YES
• Are there natural rights? YES
• Is it morally permissible to eat meat? NO
• Is the unexamined life worth living? NO
• Is truth subjectivity? YES
• Is virtue necessary for happiness? YES
• Can a computer have a mind? YES
• Can humans know reality as it is in itself? YES
• Is hell other people? YES
• Can art be created accidentally? NO
• Can we change the past? NO
• Are numbers real? NO
• Is it always better to know the truth? YES

Blog Stats

  • 192,316 hits

Jonah Lehrer has an article in a recent New Yorker about what can be called “the decline effect.” (I would link to the article, but it’s available by subscription only, and the available abstract is worthless.) Anyway, here’s the idea. Scientists from across the spectrum are finding that many of the correlations they’ve discovered seem to be “wearing off” over time. But why should this be? Lehrer suggests that it’s a matter of making big news over careful but flukey studies. So imagine this: scientists are always running all kinds of experiments and studies in many directions. Just as a matter of chance, some of them once in a while will “luck out” and examine a population which shows an especially strong correlation. Big news! Publication in Nature! Goes into textbooks! New nugget of knowledge! Then, as scientists try to replicate the study, they find weaker and weaker correlations. Hmm. The “decline effect” is especially troublesome in pharmaceutical research, where we’re finding that some of the fancy new drugs, despite initial appearances, aren’t all that more effective than drugs being used in the 50s.

But it’s hard to get these facts known, since journals are rarely interested in articles which report that scientists were unable to find some strong correlation. Somebody needs to go back and read some Popper, I think.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: