Philosophy@Utah State

Home » Uncategorized » If Michael Sandel ruled the world …

If Michael Sandel ruled the world …

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 102 other followers

Old Main, USU


You need a Philosophy T-shirt! For more information, please click here.


* Interested in presenting a paper at an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY CONFERENCE or publishing in an UNDERGRADUATE PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL? You should consider it! To see what options are available, both in state and out of state, click here.


• Is the world eternal? YES
• Do humans have contra-causal free will (i.e., can humans do otherwise)? NO
• Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? YES
• Do humans have souls? YES
• Are there natural rights? YES
• Is it morally permissible to eat meat? NO
• Is the unexamined life worth living? NO
• Is truth subjectivity? YES
• Is virtue necessary for happiness? YES
• Can a computer have a mind? YES
• Can humans know reality as it is in itself? YES
• Is hell other people? YES
• Can art be created accidentally? NO
• Can we change the past? NO
• Are numbers real? NO
• Is it always better to know the truth? YES

Blog Stats

  • 192,815 hits

… he would rewrite the economics textbooks. Excerpt:

If market values sometimes crowd out attitudes and values worth caring about (such as the love of learning for its own sake), then market reasoning must answer to moral reasoning. Standard economic models assume that markets are inert, that they do not touch or taint the goods they exchange. But if buying and selling certain goods changes their meaning, then the case for markets cannot rest on efficiency considerations alone. It must also rest on a moral argument about how to value the goods in question.

Read the rest here.



  1. Sandi says:

    Is “Mike the economist” still kicking around on here?? I would be interested in his response the this…


  2. Sandi says:

    I like what Aristotle has to say about utility in his Metaphysics…”In the beginning, a man who invented any art that went outside the ordinary range of the senses was naturally admired by other men, not only because some of his inventions were useful but because they considered him wise and superior to the rest. But as more arts were invented–some to help in securing the necessities of life and others for men’s enjoyment–the inventors of the latter were always regarded as wiser than the inventors of of the former, because their branches of knowledge did not aim at mere utility. Then [and only then] when all inventions of this kind had been acheived, the sciences that aim NEITHER AT GIVING PLEASURE NOR AT SERVING NECESSITY WERE DISCOVERED…[thus] the man of experience is considered wiser than those who know only sensations of whatever kind, and the artist wiser than the man of experience, the master than the handworker and THE THEORETICAL SCIENCE THAN THE PRACTICAL. Patently then wisdom is knowledge of principles and causes…That this is NOT A SCIENCE FOR PRODUCING THINGS is plain from the story of the earliest philosophers. For it was wonder that made men first start to philosophize and still makes them today, wondering originally about about the problems close at hand and then little by little advancing to strain their minds over the greatest perplexities…to understand and NOT FOR ANY PRACTICAL USE TO WHICH THEY MIGHT PUT IT…for it was not until after almost everything necessary for life, comfort, and recreation had been provided that this kind of knowledge began to be sought. Manifestly then we seek this knowledge for no utilitarian end but, even as we call a man free who lives for his own sake and not for another’s, so we call this the only free science, for IT ALONE EXISTS FOR ITSELF.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: