Massimo Pigliucci made what I thought was the most succinct non-illustrated criticism of the title of the Brooks piece:
It apparently didn’t occur to Brooks that perhaps philosophy started out as a reaction to the then prevalent reliance on gut feelings in matters of ethics, and to the violence and injustice that it was bringing to the human lot.
USUPhilosophy 
Massimo Pigliucci made what I thought was the most succinct non-illustrated criticism of the title of the Brooks piece:
It apparently didn’t occur to Brooks that perhaps philosophy started out as a reaction to the then prevalent reliance on gut feelings in matters of ethics, and to the violence and injustice that it was bringing to the human lot.
http://blogs.psychologytoday.com/blog/rationally-speaking/200904/philosophy-never-ends
LikeLike
That is an excellent reply.
LikeLike