Photography and the metaphysics of presence

Here is an article that makes an interesting connection between photography and the metaphysics of presence.  While the author becoming ‘steaming mad’ over people taking pictures seemed a little much, I think he is on to something concerning the more philosophical point – that photography is technological thinking par excellence, it seeks to master (capture) a moment and space in time, to control it and preserve it.  As such, it involves an unnatural removal of oneself from the basic temporality of  ‘being-in-the-world’.  

As the father of young children who sees too many parents raise their kids through a viewfinder (and I do get annoyed with it), I am glad to now have a more substantial philosophical view to reflect on as I quietly judge them for their foolishness!

Is Food the New Sex?

Here is an interesting article by the very impressive Mary Eberrstadt on Food and Sex.  She argues that food has become what sex was a generation ago.  Food is now charged with moral significance (framed in particular in terms of Kant’s universal law CI), while sex really isn’t.  

Whatever one thinks of the article, one has to praise any paper that has a section subtitle called: ‘Broccoli, Pornography, and Kant’.

More theist/atheist bickering

Discovered here at Strange Doctrines. The post links to another blog, featuring a blow-by-blow account of a stiff debate between Alvin Plantinga and Daniel Dennett at the Central APA last week. I started reading through it, but then lost interest. I’m disappointed that the reporter came away with the very strong feeling that Dennett behaved jerkishly. I’ve never gotten that impression when I’ve seen Dennett, but then again I’m a convert, I suppose. I’ve also seen Plantinga on occasion, and have always found his demeanor quite kind (pastoral, almost), but his arguments absolutely uncompelling — to the point of being … well, obtuse. Oops! Am I being jerkish?